James Petras is one of America's most erudite and accomplished sociologists. But ever since he wrote The Power of Israel in the United States, Dr. Petras has become "too controversial" for those in the field who are easily intimidated. His latest article isn't pulling any punches:
The Doctrine of 'Superior People': The Bond between Israel and World Zionism
It begins:
"The single greatest feat of Israel and its overseas missions has not been material success, or the military conquest of millions of unarmed Palestinians, it has been ideological – the widespread acceptance in the US of a doctrine that claims ‘Jews are a superior people’."
Have Zionists taken a page out of the Nazi playbook and promulgated the idea that Jews are a sort of "master race" ? (They often do act like Nazis in Occupied Palestine.)
If the main argument for Jewish supremacism is the disproportionate number of highly accomplished Jews, how about the likewise disproportionate number whose "accomplishments" are destructive or downright evil? Have the many Jews who have done great things for the world done so because of their Jewishness? Or in spite of it? Why are these admirable Jews usually the least tribal, the least religious, and the least Zionist?
Gilad Atzmon says "Jewish power is the ability to suppress any discussion of Jewish power." Consider James Petras - and Truth Jihad Radio - unsuppressed.
Kevin's blog
TruthJihad.com
24k CF Download
Download From Archive.org
5 comments:
Have Zionists taken a page out of the Nazi playbook and promulgated the idea that Jews are a sort of "master race" ?
The idea of master race was projected onto the Germans by the Jews, just like their own Holocausts of Christians were projected into the work camps to satisfy the ludicrous 6 million prophecy
Have Zionists taken a page out of the Nazi playbook and promulgated the idea that Jews are a sort of "master race" ?
Let's not be silly here. Mono-theism in its very core and foundation is an inhuman, genocidal and ultimately suicicdal master-race ideology. The moment you say "I am better than you" or "my god has a bigger dick than yours", human evolution has stopped and the war of all wars has begun.
@Unknown
Actually, you ARE better than some people and WORSE than others in specific areas of talent, skill or ability and some people DO have bigger dicks than others.
All civilization or wealth-&-health-creating human interaction of any real or lasting worth is based on a win-win dialectic, a voluntary association of humans of unequal abilities and talents, equal only in basic humanity (before the law). This system succeeds because it is based on a true premise, the inequality of individuals, in nature (genetic background), as well as access to nurture (location of birth), to its best use. "Division of labor" works well because almost everyone you meet knows how to do at least one thing far better than you and is often also willing to do something you wouldn't do for the same amount of compensation, either never or not at that point in your life.
It is not the feeling of arrogance or superiority that produces injustice but INITIATED FORCE or FRAUD (indirect force) as a result of this false perception and conception. It is OK to have false perceptions and prejudices but NOT ok to ACT on these perceptions with INITIATED violence (in the form of mob-rule-passed, collectivist democracy-racket legislation) and fraud and be morally justified UNLESS you consider the other person less-human than you. People WILL and DO intitiate force on their animals and pets every day. Leaving aside killing millions of animals for food, every time you put a leash on your dog, you're FORCING it to behave in a way appropriate to you and the society you come from. This is because you're dealing with a sub-human creature: a dog. This is also why so many racists call other races "sub-human," so that they can feel justified in treating them like dogs, actually WORSE than dogs in most cases, since a lot of these people, if they have pets, will allow their dogs in their house as almost a part of their family but hardly ever a member a another race of people.
Civilization is a win-win dialectic between groups of individuals unequal in all things except for their basic humanity. If you draw the line of humanity between one race and another, then you are by-definition considering your group superior or somehow more 'human' than that other race or group excluded. But racism is a free choice, sexism is a free choice, fatism (anti-fat people) is a free choice, retardism (anti-retarded people) is a free choice of free association, and free choices based on free thinking are REQUIRED and MANDATORY in all win-win civilizations. They are not coercion or initiated force although they might be considered irrational choices or 'vices' according to some points of view. That's alright because VICES ARE NOT CRIMES. Never have been and never friggin' will be.
Lysander Spooner
Vices Are Not Crimes
A Vindication Of Moral Liberty
http://www.lysanderspooner.org/VicesAreNotCrimes.htm
(continued . . . )
Real Libertarianism or the real discipline of freedom (very hard to practice correctly and in truly tempered and uncompromised form and nothing to do with libertinism or hedonism) starts where all group 'rights' end, starting with its most obvious incranation, this nonsense of 'civil' rights, implying the absolute inverted BS that 'civility' cannot exist through the protection of the smallest minority, the individual, when it was yet another form of coercion or initiated group-rights FORCE against the individual, that of enforced segregation, that opened that can-of-worms of FORCED INTEGRATION in the first place. Individual rights protect 'civility' just fine as long as they follow Jefferson's maxim. On the shoulders of giants, indeed.
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law', because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual." "No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him." -- Thomas Jefferson to Francis Gilmer, 1816
“Society is composed of men, and every man is a FREE agent. Since man is free, he can choose; since he can choose, he can err; since he can err, he can suffer. I go further: He must err and he must suffer; for his starting point is ignorance, and in his ignorance he sees before him an infinite number of unknown roads, all of which save one lead to error.” — Frederic Bastiat
CORRECTION: "This system succeeds because it is based on a true premise, the inequality of individuals, in nature (genetic background), as well as access to nurture (location of birth), and puts the foundation of this true premise to its best use."
Post a Comment