The Graham Hart Show will be Streamed Live Tonight on this Monday, October 23rd from 6-8pm eastern. Graham will be once again joined by Brian aka "Brizer" and His featured guest will be Miriam Al-Fatah - A Libyan activist residing in Souhern Europe, who has just returned from Tripoli.

Friday, December 14, 2012

Guns are not the problem, antidepressants are!



http://www.drugawareness.org

WARNING: Withdrawal can often be more dangerous than continuing on a medication.

REM and Antidepressants

 The official name for REM is actually called rapid eye movement and it is the rapid movement of the eyes during sleep. R. Robert Auger, a sleep researcher at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, has found links between taking serotonin reputake inhibitors (more commonly known as Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, etc.) and REM behavior disorder.

 Do you wake up feeling like you never went to bed at all? REM behavior disorder describes when a person's body does not become paralyzed during REM sleep, allowing them to act out their dreams. A relatively rare phenomenon affecting roughly 0.5% of the population, REM behavior disorder nearly always surfaced in men over 50 until recently. Now with antidepressants being subscribed for numerous health issues, this sleep disorder is beginning to show up in men, women, and children of all ages.

 Scientists are beginning to believe that the chemicals in some antidepressants affect the neurochemicals in the brain that affect atonia. As of the present, the answer to this sleep disturbance can be easily fixed by carefully tapering off your antidepressant medication.

http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,4830,00.html

Phil Hartman Tragedy: The Lawsuit


by Joal Ryan
May 28, 1999, 6:15 AM PT

On the one-year anniversary of Phil Hartman's murder at the hands of his wife, the executor of the comic's estate is pursuing a wrongful-death lawsuit against the makers of a popular antidepressant.

The complaint alleges that the prescription drug Zoloft drove Brynn Hartman to kill the NewsRadio star and then herself.

Pfizer Inc., the manufacturer of Zoloft, was named in the suit as was Arthur Sorosky, Brynn Hartman's psychiatrist. There was no comment yet from either party.

The court action was filed Thursday by Gregory Omdahl, Brynn Hartman's brother and executor of the Hartman family estate. It was one year ago today that the couple was found dead of gunshot wounds in their Encino, California, estate.

Post-mortem lab tests showed Brynn Hartman's system swimming with alcohol, cocaine and, yes, Zoloft.

Booze and illicit drugs or no, the Hartman camp claims it was the Zoloft that pushed the woman over the edge.

"Zoloft is an antidepressant that in some people causes violent and suicidal side effects," Omdahl attorney Karen Barth told Associated Press.

Last February when talk of a possible lawsuit first surfaced, Pfizer released a statement saying there was "no substantiated evidence" linking Zoloft to violent behavior.

Sorosky is being pursued by the family for prescribing the drug to Brynn Hartman.

"What Are Warning Signs That People Should Be Looking At For Someone That Might Start Killing Kids 



Can you believe these fucking assholes! Pour more gas on the fire!

Spingola Speaks 2012.12.14

Guest: Cindy and Craig Corrie, parents of Rachel Corrie, talk about their civil trial against the Israeli State and other relevant issues; The Chosenites

Deanna's site

News Page

Official chat room


Join Spingola Speaks Email List



Download

David Duke Show 2012.12.14

Today: Health and Life and Fitness Friday -- Dr. Duke goes solo today with fundamental wisdom about how to deal with the problems in your life, and how to use the breakdowns in your life and turn them into breakthroughs! Problems are a part of life. Why is it that some people are overwhelmed, even destroyed by problems that we would deem as minor, while other people with huge problems in health, relationships, family, work, career, have an attitude of thankfulness and abundance in their lives? The truth is that we are the source of whether we succumb to the problems getting in our way, or whether we solve them an move to higher levels of living. Also Dr. Duke and a caller discuss the fact that scientists think that sugar (blood glucose) is a major cause of cancer, and Dr. Duke explains that sugars from carbs such as grain are just as bad as the white table sugar we picture when we hear the word sugar. In fact, grains are worse because they contain other toxic and addictive elements that cause inflammation and all the bodily destruction that inflammation entails.

David's site

56k CF Download

Truth Hertz with Charles Giuliani 2012.12.14

Hanukkah

Archive
Show Notes

64k CF Download


Funny caller of the month: Download

Chosenite Philosophy

"Favored Races"

The original title of Darwin's book was "On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life."

Note: Shortened to The Origin of Species in 1872

 The human race has evolved to its present state of intelligence and power because of "the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life." "Race" is the central mechanism of evolution that has created all living things. "The preservation of favored races" is a simple process to understand, but its effects over time are awesome. If we examine the process, we find that at some stage in evolution we can observe a group of individuals of a single species which exists in an area segregated from other members of that same species. As a result of chance mutation, there occur genetic variations in some members of that segregated group. As the generations continue to reproduce, these genetic variations accumulate in the progeny of that segregate group. At first, the accumulated genetic variations do not make the segregate group different enough from the original species to justify calling the segregated group a new species or even a new "favored race" of the original species. However, after many generations, the segregated group or tribe which had accumulated sufficient genetic differences would be called a new "race" of the original species. Over time, these newly developed segregated races continue to accumulate genetic differences through chance mutation, variation, etc. The "favored" variations increase the survivability of the "race" which carries them. Once this new "favored race" has become different enough from the original species, it is called a new species. Hence the subtitle, "On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life."There is really no probability that the "races" would be equal. In fact, the whole notion runs counter to all evolutionary theory and to the whole science of biology.

Given the laws of biology, it would be a great surprise if the average strength or intelligence of one "race" was found to be exactly equal to the average strength or intelligence of a different "race". Despite the controversy surrounding "race", it is not particularly useful to know which "race" happens, as a result of an accident of evolutionary development, to have greater average strength or greater average intelligence because one could not predict from this average that any particular individual member of one "race" was going to be superior or inferior to any particular individual member of a different "race". There are superior and inferior, strong and weak, intelligent and intelligent individuals in all "races". Regardless of "racial" averages, one would still have to judge each individual on the basis of individual merit without reference to the average of the group to which he happened to belong. Only by judging people as individuals, could we avoid injustice and enable all people to make the maximum contribution to society. There is not such thing as a superior "race" per se, in the sense that every member of one "race" is superior to every member of another "race". Neither is there such a thing as "racial" equality in the sense that the average strength or intelligence of one "race" is equal to the average strength or intelligence of every other "race". By judging people as individuals, one could perhaps identify a (superior) socio-biological class which might be a cross section of all "races" although probably not in equal proportion. The only way you could have a (superior race) would be if a "favored race" evolved into and became the next more highly evolved species above Homo-Sapiens, in which case it would become a superior species. Eugenics is a moral commitment not a racial affiliation and any "race" that adopted a eugenic program could, given sufficient time, evolve into and become the next more highly evolved species above Homo-Sapiens. It is our hope that all "races" will accept that moral responsibility and accomplish that objective, but it can not be accomplished within the political, philosophical and religious milieu of the 20th century.  Source

Charles Darwinewicz.

Jeff Rense Radio Show - 2012.12.13


Listen  Download  Hour 1 - Gerald Celente - Trends Come Home To Roost

Listen  Download  Hour 2 - Jay Weidner - Smoke & Mirrors

Listen  Download  Hour 3 - Jim Marrs - The View From Marrs

56k CF
Rense' site