September 13, 2012

Scott Horton 2012.09.12

First interview Anthony Gregory

Anthony Gregory of the Independent Institute discusses why American conservatives are changing their minds about the War on Drugs; the hypocrisy of drug-warrior presidents (especially Obama) who previously used illegal drugs themselves; why the Democratic Party is no friend to civil liberties and the Bill of Rights; and how unjust drug laws are largely responsible for institutionalized racism and The New Jim Crow in America. (Duration: 21:56 — 5.0MB)


32k CF
Download

Second interview Eric Margolis

Eric Margolis, author of American Raj, discusses the assaults on US embassies in Libya and Egypt; the anti-Islam movie Innocence of Muslims that was apparently financed by an Israeli American; the shared propaganda techniques of Nazi Germany and today’s pro-Israel extremists; why Jews should be wary of inciting bigots into Islamophobic rages; Churchill and FDR’s coverup of “Uncle Joe” Stalin’s massacre of Polish officers in 1940; and why WWII wasn’t the “necessary” war we’re all led to believe. (Duration: 30:34 — 7.0MB)

32k CF
Download

No Agenda Global Radio
Scott Horton.org

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

so much cognitive dissonance on that margolis interview.

"jews are manufacturing hatred of Islam to manipulate the US in to war with Israel's enemies"

"WW2 was the unnecessary war"

yet

"henry ford, the evil antisemite! for pointing out the jews were manipulating the US into war!"

Anonymous said...

Good Jew, bad Jew charade. Margolis is a Jewish name.

http://www.avotaynu.com/csi/csi-result.html?page=next

As soon as they pull out the 'Not-See' card to try to compare Israhell to the fantastically successful and fair policies of the most popular freely elected leader in all of history (98% of free German vote in 1936 & 99% of free Austrian vote for reunification) you know they're full of shit.

Not only are the Shitsraelis not practicing Not-See or National Socialist policies if they did they would be completely Pro-Palestinian Liberatin, as Hitler was:


Hitler's speech on Palestine 1939

Hitler calls the English and Jewish settlers in Palestine “invaders”
And the Palestinians he calls a “freedom loving people”!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uG3re9CxBPM

"In the same way, the fact has obviously escaped Mr. Roosevelt's notice that Palestine is at present occupied not by German troops but by the English. And that the country is having its liberty restricted by the most brutal resort to force, is being robbed of its independence and is suffering the cruelest maltreatment for the benefit of Jewish interlopers. The Arabs in that country will therefore certainly not have complained to Mr. Roosevelt of German aggression but they do voice a continuous appeal to the world deploring the barbarous methods with which England is attempting to suppress a people which loves its freedom and is just defending it. This too is perhaps a problem which would have to be resolved at the conference table, that is in the presence of a judge, and not by physical force, military force, mass executions, burning down villages, blowing up houses, and so on. For one fact is in no doubt. In this case England is not defending herself against a threatened Arab attack. But as interloper, and without being called to do so, is endeavoring to establish her power in a foreign territory which does not belong to her.
~ Adolf Hitler on Palestine, in reply to Roosevelt, 28 April 1939 -- Roosevelt had asked Hitler in an absurd telegram, among other things, 'not to attack or invade' the independent nation of Palestine despite the fact that it was the English that had already invaded, occupied and brutalized that country on behalf of Jewish intruders